Thursday, April 06, 2006
Posted by The Dean of Cincinnati
 | Click image above to see Newseum! |
In today’s Enquirer, Sheila McLaughlin and Kimball Perry wrote that Todd Portune refused to attend a press conference about Hamilton County using Butler County jail space (source). This inspired Portune to send the following letter to The Enquirer.
“Commissioners Phil Heimlich and Pat DeWine held a Wednesday press conference - Commissioner Todd Portune refused to attend - to announce they believe they have a deal to lease the Butler County beds to put more criminals in jail.”
So goes the story in today’s Enquirer.
How do you drop a line like that into the article—“Commissioner Todd Portune refused to attend”—without the slightest bit of context, or even contacting me to see if there were any reasons why I did not show up?
And don’t suggest that because the Enquirer political blog discusses the exchange that took place earlier covers it. You don’t have the same circulation or readership at all.
I am frankly amazed, that such a biased and distorted comment would appear without any explanation. You have slanted the reader into believing a variety of things about me and my position by virtue of this statement.
Did it escape notice that the Resolution adopted earlier on this very issue was adopted UNANIMOUSLY by our Board. Yet you communicate to the reader that I oppose the proposal.
I have expressed a variety of concerns about the Enquirer’s slant this year that is especially protective of Commissioner Heimlich. The bias is clearly expressed in this article. No story, or mention, or discussion of the fact that Heimlich and DeWine were operating secretively with the county administrator on this deal with Butler County; they had agreed to do this, all without public discussion and all without the Board’s third commissioner being involved in the discussion at all - until yesterday that is and only yesterday because I broke the story the day before because of Si Leis informing me.
Phil hastily got a Resolution prepared to cover the tracks of illegal agreements and meetings so that the “Agreement” announced at the press conference would be legal. If I hadn’t broken this the press conference would have gone on as planned with no prior discussion or Resolution.
How do you miss that? Not report that? At least place the entire episode into context?
And at the same time indicate a position of mine that does not reconcile with my vote just an hour before?
The truth is I had misgivings about going to the press conference which was clearly a politically orchestrated event. But I couldn’t have gone anyway inasmuch as I had a noon speaking engagement at the University of Cincinnati and had to leave at 11:40 to get there on time. No one asked me to be a part of the press conference, worked with me on my schedule, or anything like that.
But yet “Commissioner Portune refused to attend”
Unbelievable.
I would like a meeting with all of you to express my concerns and to hear your point of view of what is going on. And by that I do not limit it to this singular event. There have been a number of other areas where it appears to me that the Enquirer has demonstrated a bias in its coverage. Please let me know who I need to call to schedule such.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Todd Portune
• Share This Article!
Listen to this article
Help The Cincinnati Beacon Grow! Participate in Social Networking!
Members
Register
Tell us what you think!
Anonymous comments are allowed, but you can log in above to stamp your name and to avoid typing the anti-spam code.
If you are not familiar with our rules for leaving comments, click here!
|