Hotline: (214) 481-6464

The Cincinnati Beacon
Grandma War Blog Media Round Up
Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Posted by The Dean of Cincinnati


The Cincinnati Enquirer’s Pro-War Propaganda Blog, moderated by “Grandma” Suzanne Fournier, has gathered criticism in the past few days.  Fournier writes regular pro-war posts for the series of Enquirer blogs hosted through Cincinnati.com

The blog features posts like ”Beautiful Iraqi Children Smile,” complete with happy photographs of happy Iraqi children.  Missing are the types of images as depicted in the collage above, from TheFreeSpeechZone.net.

Yesterday, at TPMMuckraker.com, Justin Wood writes the following, in an article entitled ”OH Paper Runs Army Flack’s Upbeat Iraq Blog”:

Here’s a blog that raised my eyebrows a bit.

Over at the Cincinnati Enquirer’s online site, Cincinnati.com, there’s a blog about Iraq written by military staffer whose job is to generate positive news about U.S. efforts to rebuild Iraq.

Grandma in Iraq is the title of the blog, written by Suzanne M. Fournier, a Public Affairs Officer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

The posts are largely upbeat. “Everytime [sic] an Iraqi contractor bids on a reconstruction project. . . it is a sign that democracy is winning here,” reads one. “I am confident we’ll have another banner year of success for the benefit of the people of Iraq and democracy in the Middle East,” another says.

A few hours later, the TPMMuckraker post was picked up by The Buckeye State Blog.  The introductory line provided by Buckeye State makes a powerful statement:  “Right under our noses, but the good folks at TPM Muckraker sniff it out.”

Right under our noses, indeed.  Take it as a lesson in always remembering to ask critical questions, else we allow this kind of insidious corporate propaganda to perpetuate itself unchecked.

The cult of pro-war propaganda has been growing.  This past Sunday’s Enquirer featured an editorial entitled ”Assessing the Iraq war midstream.” Richard Myers, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, met the Enquirer Editorial Board last Friday—and this column is the result of that interview.

This, just before President Bush hits town for the Reds’ Opening Day.  Today’s Enquirer is filled with pro-Bush propaganda:  ”Presidential visit a big hit with Reds,” ”Bush sharper than Reds, and ”Reporter’s brush with Bush.”

These articles offer nothing in the way of honest critical perspectives on the situation in the Middle-East.  This, in one of Ohio’s major cities—a State where many maintain that Bush stole the past election (a claim espoused by Green Party candidate for Governor Bob Fitrakis, who is himself an international elections overseer who has co-written two books on voting irregularities in Ohio).

Instead, we get tidbits like the following.

From “Reporter’s brush with Bush”:

The president spent a little extra time with Ken Griffey Jr. Griffey gave the president a bat and had a short, quiet conversation him. The White House pool reporters were particularly interested in the Griffey-Bush summit, simply because they didn’t know who most of the Reds were.

Bush seemed very cordial and engaging…

But politics aside, when the leader of the free world walks within 10 paces of you, your heart rate picks up a bit.

From “Bush sharper than Reds”:

John Prazynski of Hamilton, the father of Marine Lance Cpl. Taylor Prazynski, who died in action in Afghanistan last year, also walked onto the field with the president.

‘AN AWESOME EXPERIENCE’

Prazynski said that as he was walking out with Bush, who put his arm around his shoulder and listened to the roar of the crowd, “I asked him if he ever gets used to this.”

“He said, ‘I never will,’” Prazynski recounted. “It was an awesome experience.”

From “Presidential visit a big hit with Reds”:

The visit was relaxed and casual.

“He’s so down-to-earth,” catcher Jason LaRue said of Bush. “You don’t realize you’re talking to the president.”

Adam Dunn didn’t act as if he were talking to the leader of the free world. “Adam Dunn,” he said, extending his hand toward Bush. “How’s it going?”

Again showing his knowledge of the players, Bush commented on the University of Texas’ recent national championship in college football. Dunn spent a year at Texas before concentrating full-time on baseball.

The president took his first-pitch duty seriously. LaRue helped him warm up in the batting cage.

“It was 10, 15 pitches,” LaRue said. “He was more than ready.”

Meanwhile, concerned citizens who practice their very American rights for dissent are left with scant media to offer different perspectives.  For those with Dish TV, they can tune into Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman.  A recent headline at that web site announces, ”Another Civilian Massacre? U.S. Launches Investigation After Iraqi Police Accuse U.S. Troops of Murdering 11 Men, Women and Children Last Week

Is this true?  What are the details?  One’s things for certain:  Pro-War Grandma blogging for The Enquirer won’t have anything to say on such matters.  She’s too busy finding smiling kids so we ignore images filled with death, destruction, and blood.


Share This Article!
Listen to this article Listen to this article

Help The Cincinnati Beacon Grow! Participate in Social Networking!

Digg! del.icio.usFurl It
Members



Auto-login on future visits

Show my name in the online users list

Forgot your password?

Register

Tell us what you think!

Anonymous comments are allowed, but you can log in above to stamp your name and to avoid typing the anti-spam code.

If you are not familiar with our rules for leaving comments, click here!


  1. Dogwood says:

    Comment posted today at the Enquirer’s “Grandma Goes to Iraq” blog:

    While we’re taking about openness, Ms. Fournier, please state online who at the Enquirer hired you to run this blog and when, and to whom at the paper do you report? We look forward to your prompt and thorough reply.

  2. fred says:

    ” She’s too busy finding smiling kids so we ignore images filled with death, destruction, and blood.”

    A study by the Media research center of iraq news from the major networks between january 1 to september 30 2005 found the following

    4 times as many stories were pessimistic in analysis than were optimistic

    2 out of every 5 news stories dealt with a terrorist attack against american soldiers or the iraq people

    only 8 stories dealt with heroism or valor of american troops

    How much bad news do you want to hear? Does every outlet have to focus on the negatives only before you are happy?

  3. fred says:

    From Suzanne Fournier

    Let me take one minute to address a question that was raised today regardng my blog. I work for the US Army Corps of Engineers, they pay my salary and I volunteered to come over here as their employee to officially represent and communicate Iraq reconstruction work completed by the US Army Corps of Engineers.

    This blog is done on my own time, I’ve tried to give you a personal view of what I’ve observed here, the people, the land and reconstruction activities. Apparently some people are unhappy that I am communicating with you directly, because they are challenging that I haven’t informed you that I am a public affairs officer and my job is to work with the news media and American public.

    I’ve explained my job with the Corps several times in my blogs. If I have misled anyone, I sincerely apologize, that was clearly not my intent. I believe the American taxpayers have a right to know how their tax dollars are being invested in Iraq and I believe my current job puts me in a unique position to provide personal observations since I have traveled the Southern provinces of Iraq for the past eight months.

    The Enquirer has decided to open this blog to comments from anyone who wishes to post comments. I appreciate their openess and willingness to support freedom of expression.

    http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/iraq/

  4. Andrew Warner says:

    Fred,

    Perhaps the truth is what we deserve. If a paper is pushing an agenda either way, it is not good reporting. If the news is 3/4 negative, then that is what we should hear. We do not need one paper saying it is all sunshine and another paper saying everything is shot to hell.

    So no, I doubt anyone demands all negative coverage. Instead we just want HONEST coverage, not coverage that supports the editorial boards favorite political party.

    As the Dean has pointed out, the Enquirer has offered no presidential criticism, but a cheering section. Is there enough information about the situation in the middle east for people to make their own decisions on how effective the war is? Definitely not.

  5. says:

    fred, news of attacks on American soldiers give more support to the war (sympathy for the troops, hatred for the enemy), and that is why we keep hearing those reports. 

    News of the innocent Iraqis killed or injured as a result of war—specifically images of children—does not incite the American public to support the war.  So we don’t hear about it.

    “Objective” news would report everything.  Our news reports that which supports the corporate political agenda.

  6. says:

    In response to Grandma’s post…

    I believe the American taxpayers have a right to know how their tax dollars are being invested in Iraq and I believe my current job puts me in a unique position to provide personal observations since I have traveled the Southern provinces of Iraq for the past eight months.

    Please, Grandma Concerned-for-the-taxpayer, tell me how much money my tax dollars have spent on weapons used to kill Iraqi children. 

    I have a right to know how my tax dollars have been invested.

  7. Winston Smith says:

    Fred: The Enquirer has decided to open this blog to comments from anyone who wishes to post comments.

    Oh, the Enquirer is so good to us! Imagine that, doling out freedom of speech to us lucky proles - just like all that freedom our leaders are doling out to Iraq. Can’t you see all that freedom? Sure you can, it’s all lit up by white phosphorous bombs.

    Fred, your opinions taste like ass. Want happy talk? Go read “Pat the Bunny.” Leave the news to grown-ups who are able to face reality.

  8. Lt. William Calley says:

    fred, the media reports from Iraq are all bad news is because the reality in Iraq is all bad news. Lie to yourself if you must, but the rest of us are unable to paint a smiley face on 30 beheadings in one day.

  9. The Substitute says:

    While I was there last year, yes, there was a lot of violence.  But, as an Engineer, it’s frustrating to not hear about the dozens of schools, clinics, water treatment facilities, veterinary facilities, etc, etc, that the Corps of Engineers and Active Army, Reserve, and National Guard Engineers are opening EVERY WEEK.  The Iraqi poulace does recognize the good things we’re doing for them.  And it’s not just the engineers, either.  I’ve heard of many, many, catastrophic IED attacks NOT happening because an Iraqi kid would warn an American soldier or Marine during the course of a patrol.  We’re really trying to make things better; our efforts put people back to work, kids are getting immunized, livestock is getting treated, I could go on and on.  But you never see that, not even on Fox News!  We have created a whole new dimension of opportunities that might not otherwise be available to Iraqis.  Yet it’s “all Abu Ghraib, all the time” on the big news shows.  Should we report the bad news?  Hell yes!  That’s the best way to keep pressure up to end the war, if that’s the goal.  But that’s NOT the whole story.  Is there violence and bloodshed? Come on, I’d be an idiot to say I was never scared over there (and I spent more time in Kuwait than Iraq).

    I haven’t read this blog, so I can’t tell you how much of it is rah-rah rose colored glasses.  But I can imagine that, as an Engineer, you’ve got to wonder where the other side of the story is being told.

  10. says:

    Substitute, you are correct.  And since you recently returned your perspective is different from almost everyone’s.

    But my point still stands:  the type of destruction they show is the kind that rallies support for continued war.

    Building new schools IS good, and I agree it should be covered.  Just like the deaths of innocent Iraqi children.  That kind of coverage would be complicated (as war IS complicated), and Americans would be able to make better decisions about how and what to support—were they presented with a more accurate, complicated depiction.

    But we don’t get balanced coverage.  And while it might not be positive, it is designed to perpetuate support for the war.  Maybe pro-war propagandistic disaster porn is better for ratings than school building.

  11. Anon says:

    Recently, as American government and official culture become more corporatized, the veils which had previously obscured direct ties between official corporate-government messaging and mass media seem to be falling away. I wasn’t aware of the Enquirer’s warblog “Grandma in Iraq” before reading about it here at The Cincinnati Beacon, but I shouldn’t be surprised. My own local cable provider (Insight Cable, northern Kentucky) runs a nightly “news” show providing perspectives on the war against Iraq that is produced and distributed by the US Department of Defense. The on-air personalities report the “news” in their military uniforms. In America.

    Today at at Huffington Post Karen Kwiatkowsk quotes a Bush administration directive to Viacom media corporation “calling for the media giant to focus on stories and programming choices that ‘reinforce the Administration’s positions’ and to ‘ignore and/or discredit points of view in opposition to the Bush Administration’s foreign policy objectives for the purposes of National Security.’” On Fox News Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist brashly defended federalized control of corporate mass media, “Of course [the Presidential memo to Viacom] raises some concerns, but we can’t let this issue be blown out of proportion. Of course there have to be media guidelines. Hell, if we want to plant I.D. chips in people and torture their loved ones until they break, we will. I know the idea of governmental control over what the media can or cannot say during wartime may be an uncomfortable topic for some to digest, but it is a necessary fact of life when our enemies are trying to kill us.”

    Connecting the dots between establishment media bias and corporate ownership of the US political class is getting easier. Now I wish someone could explain to me how pollution of the public discourse by US Department of Defense/Enquirer warblog and US Department of Defense/Insight Cable “news” hour enhances our a free democracy. It seems to me more the kind of corporate-government messaging one would expect to find in an authoritarian fascist state than in a free democracy.

  12. fred says:

    Perhaps the truth is what we deserve. If a paper is pushing an agenda either way, it is not good reporting.

    perhaps we can at least we can agree to the fact that good reporting is at a premium right now.  The news out of iraq is neither all about teeth getting fixed nor is it all about children being killed.  I would be more impressed with this article if beside it was another one encouragng the tv stations to report the good news out of iraq as well.

    fred, news of attacks on American soldiers give more support to the war (sympathy for the troops, hatred for the enemy), and that is why we keep hearing those reports.

    That actually is not the case at all.  the stories of the attacks on american soldiers and their deaths or injury reduce the amount of support for the war. 

    If your premise was correct that news stories about attacks on americans were increasing popular support for the war why has support for the war dropped as the number of these stories has increase?  It makes no sense

    News of the innocent Iraqis killed or injured as a result of war—specifically images of children—does not incite the American public to support the war.  So we don’t hear about it.

    The number of children and innocent iraqs being killed by terrorist are included in the fact that 2 of 5 stories deal with either that or american soldiers being killed or attacked.  And for that matter they do report on it when even the accusation is made that americans have killed inncocent iraqs

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/30/iraq/main1454661.shtml?CMP=ILC-SearchStories

    and there are plenty of stories from the mainstream media that talk about iraq civilian death

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/04/04/iraq/main1467748.shtml?CMP=ILC-SearchStories

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/29/iraq/main1454617.shtml?CMP=ILC-SearchStories

    The facts do not back up your assertion that the bad news out of iraq is not being reported

    Oh, the Enquirer is so good to us! Imagine that, doling out freedom of speech to us lucky proles - just like all that freedom our leaders are doling out to Iraq.

    you stupid idiot you have no right to comment on the enquirer blog it is a PRIVILIGE.  when you grow up enough to have a real conversation let me know

    Fred, your opinions taste like ass. Want happy talk? Go read “Pat the Bunny.” Leave the news to grown-ups who are able to face reality.

    please see the post below yours by the substitute who was in iraq to see reality.  It is neither all good news nor all bad news out of iraq

    But my point still stands:  the type of destruction they show is the kind that rallies support for continued war.

    Please explain why the increase in negative stories about iraq has occured at the same time as a decrease in public support for the war.  the negative stories hurt public opinion.  not help it

  13. Deport fred! says:

    fred: you stupid idiot you have no right to comment on the enquirer blog it is a PRIVILIGE.

    Wrong. Free speech in this country is not a privilege, it’s a right. If you don’t agree, fred, you’re un-American. I suggest you move to another country that doesn’t bother itself with trifles like the Bill of Rights.

    We had to listen to anti-democratic people like you during Vietnam telling people who objected to the war, “America, love it or leave it.” If you find the First Amendment that objectionable, I suggest you follow that advice. Try Saudi Arabia or the Sudan; you’ll feel right at home.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:




 

Register to Vote, Right Now, at The Beacon!
Cincinnati Progressives on the Bailout
EXPOSED! Two sets of rules on Fountain Square
 
Support Independent Media!
Online Promotion
Donations Accepted!

 
Weather Conditions

What's outside?

  • clear skies title=clear skies
  • Temp: 81°F
  • Clouds: clear skies
 
News and Events
   
   
Today's Date in History

On today's date in The Beacon archives, we published:

Hey Portune!  How much to “rent” public space? (2007)
Will God Be Allowed to Visit in the New Jail? (2007)
Paying for Imaginary Flushes (2007)
NAACP Voter Education Guide:  Taxing Stock Options? (2007)
Has It All Come Down to a Jail? (2007)
Interview with Jim O’Reilly, Candidate for Court of Appeals (2006)
Finney’s Father:  A Response to Chris Finney’s Tirade Against John Pepper (2006)
DUCK AND RUN: Heimlich Alters Math on the Jail (2006)
Is The Enquirer Preparing to Abandon Team Heimlich? (2006)
Thank you for reading The Cincinnati Beacon.