Comments about the new commenting rules
Posted: 20 November 2007 05:01 PM  
Administrator
Total Posts  20
Joined  2005-12-03

Jason & Justin can’t take the heat. You have invited what you describe as “flaming trolls’ with your absurd posts, uniformed content and biased writing. What you describe as ‘flaming trolls’ are in fact criticisms of yourselves that you do not want to hear. So now you are going all blog nazi on us. Fine. See how much your page view numbers plummet.

“where divergent views collide” indeed. What utter bullshit.

==
#22 You brough grad school into the mix, Jason (H)(A)(A)(P), MA. Dean of Cincinnati. Don’t blame me. What you said was just stupid. I don’t just think you’re wrong. I think you are making things up (again) and trying pass off lazy googling for knowledge.

==
The PUBLIC truth about the hypocrisy of Christopher Smitherman and the “dean"of cincinnati was waaayyy too much huh?
What a joke the two of you are!

Profile
 
Posted: 20 November 2007 05:06 PM  
Administrator
Total Posts  20
Joined  2005-12-03

On the first comment above:  I guess this post tries to say that our entire website is a “troll” to Cincinnati.  It then goes on to make call us Nazis, and then to use the word “bullshit.” Is this really adding to the discussion?  I think it contradicts new rule #3.

On the second:  Someone, in a different strand, brought up the issue of how they wanted me to provide a link to support a claim I made without using Wikipedia.  I did, then made a joke—saying that the MA turned out to be good for something after all.  Perhaps I cannot make little jokes anymore, but the etymology of the phrase “living room” and my credentials are irrelevant to the overall posting.

On the third:  Well, I have no idea what that person is talking about.  They seem to be making fun of me and Smitherman for reasons I do not understand.  I see no substance there.

Profile
 
Posted: 20 November 2007 06:20 PM  
Administrator
Total Posts  20
Joined  2005-12-03

Another comment recently left:

==
Brendan doesn’t allow comments, period. That’s one of the many reasons that nNobody reads his sh*tty little blog, he’s talkiingto himself and agreeing with his own smug (and almost always wrong) little points.

PS, my previous comment were 100% on topic. Thanks for proving my point. Hypocrite.
==

Again, this poster just insults Brendan, who hosts the blog Spacetropic.  I’m not sure what previous comment is being referred—a problem with anonymous comments.  I did get rid of some earlier—before I had the idea of this archive—but I think the point is getting clear. 

Some posters are just nasty and venomous for no reason.

Profile