Hot News!
• TIF and The Banks: Tax Dollar Boondoggle?
• The 60th Anniversary of the Israeli/Palestinian Conflict
Contact Us
v mail, fax: (214) 481-6464
e mail: click here
Events
 May 17, 9:30am - 12:30pm The 2008 Day of Dialogue Series- Education and the Common Good: Six Dialogues on Six Critical Issues: Health Care, Economic Development, Education, Immigration, Campaign Finance Reform and Foriegn Policy. Join us at the First Unitiarin Church, 536 Linton Street. All Are Welcome at these free events, reservations requested. |
Monday, May 19th, 6-7pm Cincinnati Progressive United’s 1st planning meeting, Bond Hill Branch Library, 1740 Langdon Farm Rd. at Jordan Crossing
|
June 28, 9am - 5pm Nonviolent Peacemaking Workshop, Presented by the Michigan Peace Team, Peaslee Neighborhood Center, call 579-8547 to sign up |
Wednesday, May 07, 2008
We Demand a Vote: Down with the red-light cameras!
Posted by The Dean of Cincinnati
Photo courtesy of here.
Law enforcement officers are charged with a simple, but noble, assignment: protect and serve. And while people may debate the degree to which red-light cameras protect motorists, the fact remains that City Hall wishes to implement these cameras downtown—not because they hope to make our streets more safe, but because they hope to generate revenue for the struggling budget. This is a violation of that simple assignment with which our law enforcement officers are charged. Instead of protecting, and serving, the red-light cameras are just a scam for ticketing people at a distance for profit.
That’s why The Cincinnati Beacon proudly endorses the NAACP petition drive and the ”We Demand a Vote” coalition.
What happens when law enforcement becomes a means for making money?
I wholeheartedly reject the premise, because that same premise logically supports absurdities—like a ”jay walking vortex.”
I remember, at the victory party to defeat the jail tax, talking with Christopher Finney (who had been a long-time political adversary). He said he had learned, through collaborating with “liberal” groups like the Green Party and the NAACP that there was actually a shocking philosophical overlap with his own “conservative” group COAST. He said COAST opposed government spending because it viewed taxation as a means of government oppression. Then he said he realized that groups like the NAACP also oppose government oppression—and that such oppression can manifest in a variety of ways. That touchstone, he hypothesized, could serve as a starting-point for future collaboration.
And it seems, to me anyway, that the idea of “oppression” is a great lens through which to interpret the red-light camera proposal. By altering the basic premise of law enforcement—from protecting and serving to making money for government—City Hall has taken a small step towards implementing an oppressive police state where the interests of government take precedent over the interests of the people they are supposed to serve.
• Share This Article!
Listen to this article
|  |
Register
Anonymous comments are allowed, but you can log in above to stamp your name and to avoid typing the anti-spam code.
If you are not familiar with our rules for leaving comments, click here!
07 May 2008 at 12:21 pm | #
Sounds to me like this will free up police manpower; to better respond to your alarm issues.
07 May 2008 at 05:50 pm | #
I’m not going to even begin harping on the idiocy of opposing this any longer. I will comment on the photo that you included. Those sprays and all the other internet techniques out there do not work. Mythbusters on the Discovery Channel, tested them all and none work.
08 May 2008 at 11:16 am | #
.
Anyone who supports this ‘China Syndrome’ monitoring deserves to have their freedoms stripped !