• Tea Party leader gets grilled by NAACP membership

On today's date in The Beacon archives, we published:
•Smitherman still saying the issue is about a “streetcar” (2009)v mail: (513) 685-0678
e mail: click here
Posted by The Dean of Cincinnati
Law enforcement officers are charged with a simple, but noble, assignment: protect and serve. And while people may debate the degree to which red-light cameras protect motorists, the fact remains that City Hall wishes to implement these cameras downtown—not because they hope to make our streets more safe, but because they hope to generate revenue for the struggling budget. This is a violation of that simple assignment with which our law enforcement officers are charged. Instead of protecting, and serving, the red-light cameras are just a scam for ticketing people at a distance for profit.
That’s why The Cincinnati Beacon proudly endorses the NAACP petition drive and the “We Demand a Vote” coalition.
What happens when law enforcement becomes a means for making money?
I wholeheartedly reject the premise, because that same premise logically supports absurdities—like a “jay walking vortex.”
I remember, at the victory party to defeat the jail tax, talking with Christopher Finney (who had been a long-time political adversary). He said he had learned, through collaborating with “liberal” groups like the Green Party and the NAACP that there was actually a shocking philosophical overlap with his own “conservative” group COAST. He said COAST opposed government spending because it viewed taxation as a means of government oppression. Then he said he realized that groups like the NAACP also oppose government oppression—and that such oppression can manifest in a variety of ways. That touchstone, he hypothesized, could serve as a starting-point for future collaboration.
And it seems, to me anyway, that the idea of “oppression” is a great lens through which to interpret the red-light camera proposal. By altering the basic premise of law enforcement—from protecting and serving to making money for government—City Hall has taken a small step towards implementing an oppressive police state where the interests of government take precedent over the interests of the people they are supposed to serve.
|
| ![]() |
Anonymous comments are allowed, but you can create an account above to stamp your name and to avoid typing the anti-spam code.
If you are not familiar with our rules for leaving comments, click here! The Cincinnati Beacon is not responsible for the contents of any comments. Comments do not represent the views of the moderators of The Cincinnati Beacon.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
07 May 2008 at 02:21 pm | #
Sounds to me like this will free up police manpower; to better respond to your alarm issues.
08 May 2008 at 01:16 pm | #
.
Anyone who supports this ‘China Syndrome’ monitoring deserves to have their freedoms stripped !
25 Aug 2009 at 01:03 pm | #
Thank you for the explanation.