Hot News!
• Tea Party leader gets grilled by NAACP membership
On today's date in The Beacon archives, we published:
•Smitherman still saying the issue is about a “streetcar” (2009)•More on Amy Goodman’s Arrest and the Struggle for a Free Media (2008)
•Journalist Amy Goodman Unlawfully Arrested At RNC (2008)
•Seizing Illegal Guns—Thinking About 2% (2007)
•Information or Advertisements? (2007)
•Nick Lachey: “I have never supported George W. Bush.” (2007)
Contact Us
v mail: (513) 685-0678
e mail: click here
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Criticism of malariotherapy pre-dates Wulsin’s political career
Posted by The Dean of Cincinnati
Photo courtesy of here.
A recent campaign mailer from Steve Black (who is running against Vic Wulsin for the Democratic nomination in Ohio’s 2nd congressional race) cites an active complaint with the Ohio State Medical Board against Dr. Wulsin’s license. Those supporting Wulsin are likely to call this a political maneuver, but her involvement with malariotherapy (the subject of the complaint) pre-dates her relatively recent political career, and these malariotherapy experiments have been characterized as “bizarre” and “charlatan.” So politics aside, Black’s campaign mailer raises important questions about not only Wulsin, but the larger medical issues surrounding malariotherapy.
Thanks to the WayBack machine, we can see this 2004 snapshot of The Heimlich Institute’s web page. In fact, according to an article uploaded to Heimlich’s former site and published in 2002, “Malariotherapy is the only treatment for HIV patients today with the potential to control the AIDS pandemic and at low cost. Malariotherapy’s scientific basis and safety is clearly established.”
There’s just one problem with Heimlich’s claim: medical experts had been crying foul about these medical experiments on human subjects in China for over a decade.
In 1994, the LA Times, published this article, which includes the following excerpts:
“Heimlich’s life-saving maneuver for people who aspirate food doesn’t qualify one as an HIV expert,” said leading AIDS researcher Dr. Anthony Fauci, who called malaria therapy “quite dangerous and scientifically unsound.”
(...)
“He is risking people’s lives and he is trading on the life-saving aura of his name to get people to help him,” said Dr. John Renner of the National Council Against Health Fraud, which has been tracking the Heimlich project.
“After this, he won’t go down in history for the Heimlich maneuver. He’ll go down in history as a bizarre, mad scientist.”
Even The Cincinnati Enquirer covered the story back in 2003, in this piece by Robert Anglen:
[Heimlich’s] experiments - which seek to destroy HIV, the AIDS-causing virus, by inducing high malarial fevers- have been criticized by the Centers for Disease Control and the Food and Drug Administration and condemned by other health professionals and human rights advocates as a medical “atrocity.’‘
(...)
Peter Lurie, a former AIDS researcher and now a physician with Public Citizen’s Health Research Group in Washington, D.C., calls the malariotherapy studies dangerous and unnecessary.
(...)
“It is charlatanism of the highest order,” Dr. Lurie says of malariotherapy. “It is exploiting the lack of decent medical care in China.”
So with widely publicized criticism of and outrage towards Heimlich’s work spanning 1994-2003, one must wonder why Wulsin got on board with the Heimlich Institute in 2004, when she wrote this draft report outlining how to develop a “market niche” for malariotherapy (which she suggested renaming “immunotherapy” due to bad publicity). From the introduction of her report:
And here’s Wulsin’s marketing concept, with the italics added:
Programmatic Next Steps
1. Write a strategic plan for the Heimlich Institute.
2. Rename malariotherapy “Immunotherapy” [“IT”].
3. Verify and elaborate on East Africa Phase II trial.
4. Explore further collaborating with Michele Ashby, the Denver Gold Group, and/or the CEOs, medical directors, &/or others of appropriate mining companies.
5. Complete and publish review of Immunotherapy.
Interestingly, Wulsin said back in 2006 that the idea for malariotherapy has “no scientific validity,”—which is interesting given her “Programmatic Next Steps” outlined above. One might also wonder why Wulsin would include the following in her report, if she believed it had no validity: “Further field studies of Immunotherapy, including Phase III and IV clinical trials, require the verification of the encouraging results from East Africa, elaboration on discrepancies between them and the results from the Phase II trial in China, and professional dissemination and transparent discussion with scientists, physicians, and other stakeholders.”
It is unclear why something with no validity requires further study and renaming.
• Share This Article! | Listen to this article |
|  |
Register
Anonymous comments are allowed, but you can create an account above to stamp your name and to avoid typing the anti-spam code.
If you are not familiar with our rules for leaving comments, click here! The Cincinnati Beacon is not responsible for the contents of any comments. Comments do not represent the views of the moderators of The Cincinnati Beacon.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
31 Jan 2008 at 11:58 am | #
Philadelphia Daily News (PA) February 29, 1988
HEIMLICH USES MALARIA TO TREAT CANCER
Philadelphia Daily News (PA), February 29, 1988
Author: Associated Press
Dateline: CLEVELAND
Dr. Henry Heimlich, the physician who developed a maneuver to save choking victims, is trying to treat cancer patients in Mexico by deliberately giving them malaria, a newspaper reported.
Heimlich has treated three people at a Mexico City hospital since December by infecting them with a non-lethal strain of malaria on the belief that the 103- to 104-degree fever produced by the disease kills cancer cells, The Cleveland Plain Dealer said yesterday.
Heimlich, 67, believes that malaria, in addition to killing cancer through fever, can stimulate the body’s natural immune system to fight cancer.
Malaria is an infection caused by parasitic micro-organisms and is spread by mosquitoes. It causes high fevers, sweating and chills.
Some medical researchers say Heimlich’s procedures should be tested first on laboratory animals and tissue cultures. They also said they were skeptical about the quality of cancer research in Mexico. U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials said Heimlich’s so-called “malariatherapy” was “not an acceptable treatment or therapy.”
Heimlich, contacted yesterday at his home in Cincinnati, said that describing his work as “south-of-the-border research…is despicable.” He said cancer research regulations in Mexico were more stringent than those in the United States.
Heimlich, a professor at Xavier University in Cincinnati and head of the Heimlich Institute, said he developed his theories after he said studies showed that Third World nations with high malaria rates had low incidences of cancer.
02 Feb 2008 at 12:28 pm | #
The Wulsin for Congress campaign just issued a response to the Black for Congress campaign mailer. Documents are here: http://tinyurl.com/2d6p6n
Here is how Team Wulsin responded to the above issues:
RHETORIC
Black: The President of the National Council Against Health Fraud has requested an investigation of Wulsin by the Ohio State Medical Board on charges that she covered up unethical medical experiments.
REALITY
The Ohio State Medical Board has taken no action against Wulsin because the charges are false. [Link to Ohio State Medical Board, License Search: http://tinyurl.com/39z643 ]
03 Feb 2008 at 04:43 am | #
File this thread under “WHO CARES?”
Wulsin will win over “Mean Jean,” PERIOD. END OF DISCUSSION.
03 Feb 2008 at 11:11 am | #
Re: “who cares?,” obviously NCAHF does. They filed a complaint against Dr. Wulsin’s license. Equally obvious, the Beacon cares. The Dean as been reporting on Wulsin’s association with the Heimlich Institute’s medical atrocity experiments for years.
Facts raise legitimate questions about Dr. Wulsin’s judgment, both as a medical professional and as a politician. For example:
1) Per the above Beacon item, the Heimlich Institute’s experiments on Third World patients had received decades of widely-reported criticism, especially the 2003 exposes of the China experiments which involved the clandestine participation of UCLA professors as reported on the front page of the Enquirer. Only a year later, why would Dr. Wulsin be foolish enough to get involved with the Heimlich malariotherapy project, let alone consider becoming the Director of the Heimlich Institute as she has publicly admitted?
2) Phil Heimlich is the vice president of the Heimlich Institute. Slice it any way you like; Vic Wulsin was working for Phil Heimlich, arguably the hardest-right Republican in Southern Ohio. Since then, his fortunes have nose-dived, but
in 2004 he was the powerful president of the county commission. At the time, Dr. Wulsin obviously had aspirations of running for political office as a Democrat. How could she be daft enough go to work for an organization so closely associated with someone like Phil Heimlich?
While covering one’s ears and loudly proclaiming “nyah-nyah I can’t hear you” may be Anon 2:43’s response, others may demand substantive answers from Dr. Wulsin before they decide to vote her into national office.