Hot News!
• Tea Party leader gets grilled by NAACP membership
On today's date in The Beacon archives, we published:
•Smitherman still saying the issue is about a “streetcar” (2009)•More on Amy Goodman’s Arrest and the Struggle for a Free Media (2008)
•Journalist Amy Goodman Unlawfully Arrested At RNC (2008)
•Seizing Illegal Guns—Thinking About 2% (2007)
•Information or Advertisements? (2007)
•Nick Lachey: “I have never supported George W. Bush.” (2007)
Contact Us
v mail: (513) 685-0678
e mail: click here
Sunday, October 21, 2007
Nick Lachey Christens Justin Jeffre’s Mobile Communication Unit
Posted by The Dean of Cincinnati
Photo courtesy of here.
Nick Lachey came to town yesterday to “christen” the Jeffre for Council’s Mobile Communication Unit (MCU), the newest innovation in political campaigning. The MCU is a graphically enhanced bookmobile that can be strategically deployed to distribute political messages and campaign information in an interactive, multimedia, street-level fashion.
Lachey used a bottle of OTR Ale to christen the MCU, kicking off the Justin Jeffre 52-Neighborhood Tour. The MCU will be used to give presentations of Jeffre’s “Comprehensive Neighborhood Rescue Plan”—a non-partisan effort through collaboration with Libertarian candidate Michael Earl Patton.
“A digital revolution and wireless technology allow for more efficient means of communication,” said Jeffre. The MCU is part of Jeffre’s new vision. “We need to move beyond name recognition. Instead of drawing attention to our names, we need to draw attention to the presence of our ideas, so we can promote a deep discussion about the direction of our community.”
• Share This Article! | Listen to this article |
|  |
Register
Anonymous comments are allowed, but you can create an account above to stamp your name and to avoid typing the anti-spam code.
If you are not familiar with our rules for leaving comments, click here! The Cincinnati Beacon is not responsible for the contents of any comments. Comments do not represent the views of the moderators of The Cincinnati Beacon.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.
21 Oct 2007 at 04:17 pm | #
Still waiting to see the plan. Where is it? Is it a rehash of the old plan that gave people a good reason not to vote for you in the Mayoral race? You know, the one where you said community councils should have eminent domain powers, and make money off of the property they seize.
21 Oct 2007 at 06:41 pm | #
FRINGEMOBILE
21 Oct 2007 at 07:20 pm | #
Since the Green Party has added Eric Prince, Christian Supremecist owner and operator of Iraqi murder-machine, Blackwater, along with the GOP, to their list of smarmy contributors seems the money’s flowing like wine. When are people going to get it? The Greens are just a front for the Republicans. A make-believe party with the sole purpose of slandering Democrats.
Who will they take money from next?
21 Oct 2007 at 08:56 pm | #
that looks very fuel efficient. what type of mileage does it get? how many tons of CO2 are you going to expend trying to be elected on an environmental platform?
21 Oct 2007 at 11:50 pm | #
It is a sin to waste beer. For allowing that to happen, Jeffre should be tarred and feathered.
22 Oct 2007 at 11:16 am | #
Conspicuous consumption Green style? Who’s this rock star campaign strategy supposed to appeal to? It’s obvious you think big but this is not a senate run.
22 Oct 2007 at 11:46 am | #
Cincysue, #3, you said, “The Greens are just a front for the Republicans,”
Cincysue, when are you going to get it? The Greens dislike most of the policies of the Republican Party, probably more than you do. One of the the primary problems the Greens have with the Dems, is that they have moved so far to the right that they are beginning to look and sound more like Republicans than many Republicans, the Greens are promoting their own agenda, which sounds a lot like the “Old Democratic Philosophy”.
You do know, don’t you, that there are a number of Democratic nations around the world who have more than two parties. The problem with the two party system that we now have is that a lot of old lefties, like me, are left out, we have no way to have our voices heard or our ideals promoted.
We need a way to include every person in the process. Vera Z.
22 Oct 2007 at 01:37 pm | #
VeraZ - I’m nuts about third, fourth, fifth parties. But the Greens are a pawn of the Republicans and I stick by that and the Libertarians are a tool of corporate America hellbent on privatizing and deregulating everything. Give me a solid Socialist Party candidate and he/she would get my vote instead of a Democrat. In the current fascist climate, it’s critical to vote against the most evil of the choices, even if what you end up with isn’t ideal.
So if you vote Green, you’re voting Republican. Vote Green and you assure a President Guiliani or Romney and World War III. That is if it that doesn’t happen before Bush’s term ends or if he doesn’t declare Marshall Law and just stay in. And I blame you Greens for that too.
Party affiliations of local candidates really doesn’t mean anything. Their party loyalties and positions change with the wind.
22 Oct 2007 at 01:43 pm | #
JFD/Bill Landeck, I never said anything about giving community councils eminent domain powers. You have a bad habit of putting words in my mouth and then trying to use them to attack me. It’s fine if you disagree with me on the issues, but don’t make stuff up.
cincysuz, you should stop making stuff up also. The Democrats are the ones that take huge amounts of corporate and Republican money. That’s why they support the Republican and corporate agenda.
Greens don’t slander Democrats, we just point out how bad their records are. Clinton gave us NAFTA and GATT. Clinton/Gore gave us welfare reform that put children at risk. Billary, Kerry and Edwards all voted for the war, the Patriot Act and all the other horrible bipartisan policies that we have. Gore’s running mate is Bush’s biggest cheerleader.
Vera Z, we’ve been locked up in a two party prison for too long. The corporate Dems and corporate Republicans are the same. You can expect more bipartisan wars, jails, draconian laws, constitution shredding and abuse of the people they are supposed to serve. We need change and the Green Party is the peace and social justice party.
22 Oct 2007 at 02:16 pm | #
answers for everyone except me about the mileage and carbon footprint of your new vehicle? I am hurt
22 Oct 2007 at 03:03 pm | #
formerly f, why don’t you find out about your own mileage and the carbon footprint on your vehicle and let us know what it is?
It would take a lot of time and be a lot of trouble to go through to satisfy an anonymous troll. I can’t predict the future, but I don’t think driving the MCU around for two weeks is going to have a major impact. I am interested in converting it to bio-diesel or the grease car technology, but that’s not in the budget just yet.
22 Oct 2007 at 05:26 pm | #
Not in a Green’s budget to be environmentally responsible, but in the budget to take to the road in lavish style? That’s why it’s hard to take nouveau Greens seriously. So many are “do as I say, not as I do.” If the Greens refuse to live by their very own platform, then why would anyone else? It’s like Jenna Bush saying it wouldn’t be practical for HER to go to Iraq.
22 Oct 2007 at 06:17 pm | #
Hard to imagine a nastier batch of mean-spirited scolds than the above posters. Win or lose, Justin adds some pizazz to an other wise gray slate of candidates and the Mobile Communication Unit is a heap of big fun.
All you shriveled old prunes are classic Cincinnati, ready to stamp out anything interesting the moment it rears its head - or in Justin’s case, his hat.
Hey Justin, nice brim, nice buggy! Ride in style, baby, to a council seat!
As for cincysuz, is it possible for you to shut your cake hole on this blog for just one day? If payment is required - I’d say your going rate is about $2/hour - I’m ready to chip in.
22 Oct 2007 at 06:41 pm | #
cincysuz, show me where I said anything about outlawing trucks and RV’s. Do you have a car that runs on gas?
I said we should be tougher on major polluters like Duke and P&G. In the free market they should have to pay for their waste. It’s a little different comparing a private citizens vehicle that’s going on a two week tour through the city and major corporations that get subsidized with our tax dollars.
I’m not raising a quarter of a million dollars from corporations for a position that only pays $60,000 like your Democratic candidates are. I’m running a grass-roots campaign that is innovative, creative and inexpensive. I could ride my bike all over town, but that wouldn’t get my message and name out there as much.
The Green Party is the peace and social justice party. There is more to my platform than just the environment, like election reform. The Green Party isn’t just about the environment either. We are opposed to the bipartisan quagmire.
If you say you’re against the war, why do you vote for pro-war Democrats like Kerry, Edwards and Clinton? The corporate Democrats support the war and pretend that they don’t. If they voted for it (and they did) and continue to fund it, they are for the war.
Stop supporting a pro-war party that’s filled with pro-war candidates if you want to end the war.
Nouveau Green? Clinton and Gore gave the auto industry an eight year holiday from higher fuel efficiency and safety standards.
Clinton and Gore also opened up large areas of Northern Alaska for oil and gas drilling and supported the destruction by coal companies of mountaintops in Appalachia. Leiberman was Gore’s Chenney.
Shall we continue?
22 Oct 2007 at 06:48 pm | #
jj, looking forward to welcoming you to Northside. When are you schedualed to visit here. Vera Z.
22 Oct 2007 at 07:13 pm | #
cincysuz,
How much do you think he paid for the MCU?
Joe Wessels reports that he got the vehicle for just over $500.
22 Oct 2007 at 07:22 pm | #
No answer to JFD or f. Typical ‘green’ hypocrite.
It’s two weeks until the election, where is that much ballyhooed ‘plan’ anyway?
22 Oct 2007 at 07:24 pm | #
BTW, nice hat. All serious candidates for government office where goofy hats, don’t they?
22 Oct 2007 at 08:01 pm | #
because i dont go around promoting how environmentally friendly i am nor do i advocate programs that would force others to take care of the environment when living a different lifestyle.
i try very hard not to preach anything that i dont follow. it is a good way to live
doesn’t it only cost about 1,000 bucks to convert to a greasecar system? too bad for you that isn’t in the budget.
given that the reason you aren’t converting to greasecar technology on your campaign vehicle is money in the budget I would be very interested to see your personal greascar since we know you have a spare 100 bucks
or perhaps you are a preacher and not a doer
22 Oct 2007 at 08:13 pm | #
I don’t know; why don’t you ask Jim Tarbell?
22 Oct 2007 at 10:01 pm | #
JJ#9: “JFD/Bill Landeck, I never said anything about giving community councils eminent domain powers.”
I read your position paper from your unsuccessful run for Mayor. In it you talked about community councils using eminent domain to take over vacant houses. There was also the ability to sell them, and the money to go into a trust that the councils would share. It was also called a neighborhood rescue plan; that’s why I asked if the “new plan” (which you talk about as if it exists) was a rehash of the “old plan”.
22 Oct 2007 at 10:33 pm | #
Ol’ Dirty Must-be-a-turd - No thanks. I’ll pass. I think I’d prefer to just continue to be a pain in your fat ass. But Justin would surely appreciate an opportunity to take advantage of that fund raising offer to fuel his gas guzzling hog. After all those frequent trips to Wal Mart to stock up on Chinese made goods can be costly.
22 Oct 2007 at 10:58 pm | #
I’m still laughing at the pic of this JJmobile. There’s Jeffre, admiring red lipstick Jeffre (that is the funniest pic on the planet).
Don’t bring that carbon footprint-sucking hog to Northside. Or anywhere else. There’s no need. While many of us are doing our best to conserve, bundle the errands & trips, walk, rideshare or utilize public transport, here rolls the belching JJmobile.
I imagine you have gas & oil stocks in your portfolio. It’s obvious you have money to burn for fuel in that sucking hog. The voters you are attempting to reach don’t have that luxury of expanding the percentage of pay for car & truck fuel. $20 a week is a big hurt for many. Great way to alienate a lot of votes. Actually, I like Mitch Painter’s simple panel truck a lot more than the JeffreHog.
I’m with JFD. Dean was blowing last week about the neighborhood plan. If it truly exists, it’s about time to get it out here so the voters can examine it before heading to the polls or doing absentee balloting.
23 Oct 2007 at 12:58 am | #
Wow, such deep thoughts from CincyCapell. Your punditry is so impressive.
CincyCapell, I get a lot compliments on my hat. I’m sure you know a lot about style. Why don’t you send us a picture so we can see how cool you look? Oh yeah, you’re just an anonymous chump that supports the corporate agenda. Since my old friend that’s a stylist gave me the hat I think I trust her judgment over yours.
formerly f, I support tough environmental justice legislation and fully funding the Office of Environmental Quality. Do you get it?
I’m not one of your favorite corporate candidates so $1,000 dollars is a lot of money for my campaign. Also converting to a grease car will likely cost more than that. It will take time to convert and you have to figure out the logistics of fueling it up which would be complicated because there is a lack of infrastructure to support that.
Of course you’re not really concerned with the environment. You’re just being an anonymous troll that can only make petty little arguments.
When I get on council I’ll do what I say I’m going to do. I never said I was going to make my personal vehicle a grease car and it’s not a part of my platform.
The government should be investing in green technologies because it has a lot more resources than an average individual and it should be planning long term.
Instead of the current street car plan we should look at trolley buses that run on biodiesel, vegetable oil or the grease car technology. If the city was doing this it would make it more practical for citizens like me to do it.
It would be a more flexible system that serves more people. Electric cars use electricity made from coal which is bad for the environment and this plan looks like a boondoggle for 3CDC.
For $100 million we could have a huge fleet of grease vehicles that serve all 52 neighborhoods. They could get free fuel from the local restaurants that normally have to pay to get rid of their waste. It would be a win for everybody and create the infrastructure to make it practical for Cincinnatians to make their own conversions making us the greenest city in the nation. We could get big polluters like Duke and P&G to sponsor them and with a little creativity they could all be almost as cool as my MCU!
23 Oct 2007 at 01:55 am | #
Shorter Jeffre: “Do as I say, not as I do.” What a fraking hypocrite! Note to your stylist “friend” (not that there’s anything wrong with it): you look like a major dork.
“I don’t know; why don’t you ask Jim Tarbell?” Great point Dean, you mean the guy who couldn’t come up with a few hundred signatures to get on the school board ballot? The guy who lost election after election, only to be finally be appointed to fill a vacancy on council?? You’re right, 98DegreeBoy should definitely go with the hat.
23 Oct 2007 at 03:26 am | #
.
This is the most innovative, creative marketing tool that we have ever seen in a council race. Bring technology to the people and clearly demonstrate you have the vision to move this city forward. We knew we had a great instinct. We are Impressed.
.
23 Oct 2007 at 07:16 am | #
Whoooo. That’s where we part company. I like the hat. It’s smart and dapper.
23 Oct 2007 at 07:55 am | #
CincyCappel,
No, I mean the guy who was on council for four terms and was Vice Mayor.
23 Oct 2007 at 10:20 am | #
Some dipshit said, “I’m not raising a quarter of a million dollars from corporations for a position that only pays $60,000 like your Democratic candidates are.”
That is the worst argument you could possibly make about money and politics. The salary should have nothing to do with how much money you raise. In New Hampshire, state legislators are paid $100 a year for a decidedly “part-time job.” Are you saying New Hampshire campaigns should be limited to a $100 spending limit? Closer to home, Cincinnati school board members are paid $125 per meeting. Nobody’s getting rich there. If they had a meeting every week (which they do not), that would be $6,500 per year. Is that the limit we should impose on school board races?
Serving your city, your state, or your country should be an honor. Are you only in it for the money, JJ2k7? Is this because you can’t sell records, anymore?
23 Oct 2007 at 10:23 am | #
Is it more fuel efficient to have a Campaign Headquarters that uses fuel only when moving from one location to another or to have an office that must be rented, heated and cooled?
During the last campaign we rented space, installed phones, provided utilities and made every volunteer come to the office. This makes it more polluting to have people traveling back and forth from all areas of the city. With the MCU we go to the people and shut it down. It is not a diesel so conversion would mean changing the engine. It uses about as much gas as a delivery truck, only when it is running. Since it was created in 1978 it has served as a platform to bring knowledge to people and continues in that purpose.
With cellular phones and laptop wi-fi computers we no longer need to rent a permanent facility. We take the office to the neighborhoods we serve in order to better serve them.
With all the trolls adding their two cents we should be rich in no time.
23 Oct 2007 at 01:58 pm | #
Style. So that’s what has been missing in City Government. And candidates taking campaign advice from their stylists. Is anyone really going to vote for this clown? And where’s that neighborhood plan anyway? Is JJ going to release it sometime before the Banks are built??
23 Oct 2007 at 04:38 pm | #
Dear Beacon—I noticed many candidates advertise in your paper. I want to congragulate you on duping canddiates into underwriting a paper that promotoes the candidacies of Justin Jeffries and Michael Earl Patton.
Of course, you’ll never get away with such unethical and dishonest practices ever again, but enjoy your short-term infusion of advertising revenue from candidates who unwittingly paid for Jeffree-Patton propoganda.
Of course, you paper is only short term—a temporary rag that’s really used for the purposes of promoting two campaigns.
23 Oct 2007 at 07:20 pm | #
A 1978 SUV? It’s not even a diesel? Are you kidding us? You should name it the Titanic, an apropriate moniker for the gas guzzling behemoth because your campaign is going to sinking like its namesake.
23 Oct 2007 at 08:44 pm | #
Now I get it. The JeffreMobile is just another roadblock, another smokescreen to get voters to forget about their issues & exactly what Jeffre’s position is on their concerns. We’re supposed to be wowed by the old bookmobile spun into the JeffreMobile.
Where’s this Neighborhood Plan that Dean was oozing & drizzling about the other week? I guess the big question is, the Neighborhood Plan - does it really exist?
Jeffre, you can worry & dither over public transport when you get the streets cleaned up of trash & trash.
23 Oct 2007 at 09:00 pm | #
The company I work for delivers goods in late model Chevy vans with 8 cylander engines. Driving in the city they get about 15 MPG. That 29 year old SUV has an old tech 8 cylander engine, possibly even a 10 or 12 cylander. There is no way that monster gets more than 8-10 MPG in the city. A buddy of mine has a fully restored 77 Firebird and it gets no about 12 MPG. You should be ashamed of yourself, you’re nothing but a hypocrite. The greens should kick you out of their party.
23 Oct 2007 at 09:46 pm | #
Justin, you mentioned using the $100 million dollar streetcar money for a fleet of grease fueled vehicles. An observation and a question.
Observation: it is unlikely that the 100 million would be available for a non capital project. Grease fueled vehicles aren’t going to be TIF eligible (-25 mil) a grant from the state is unlikely as federal funds are most commonly used for busses (-10 mil) and I can’t imagine the city would devote capital funds to the project (-25 mil)
Question: when would we reach peak grease? If you can run vehicles off of a waste product that is great, but how many cars can run off of grease before we hit the maximum?
23 Oct 2007 at 10:45 pm | #
For weeks now we keep hearing about the “plan”; still no plan. I don’t give a rats ass about your partymobile; where’s the plan? I don’t want to make fun of you for your urban assault vehicle, I want to make fun of you for your plan that doesn’t exist to save the neighborhoods.
24 Oct 2007 at 01:56 am | #
Jrosen, your ignorance is showing and your questions and comments are petty. Grease cars run on vegtable oil as well as hemp seed oil which was grown in America during the war years to supply rope and sail cloth. That was before the oil companies and chemical companies convinced everybody that all hemp was marijuana and needed to be prohibited because it was causing the decay of our society. Had nothing to do with the fact that hemp replaces plastic and has thousands of uses. The sailing ships of yesterday used hemp rigging. The Declaration of Independence is written on hemp paper and yet our government prohibits its growth and use.
24 Oct 2007 at 02:03 am | #
J Rosen, I was just making the point that we can do a lot more with that kind of money and we should have all options on the table, not just one over-hyped and over-priced plan.
I mentioned other technologies as well. I don’t know when we would hit peak grease, but I think it would be good to have a couple of different kinds of alternatives. The more neighborhood business districts with restaurants we have, the more fuel that will be available. I’m not an expert on it, but it is exciting that people are getting clean and free fuel. I think it’s worthy of consideration.
I’m glad you guys are so excited about our new Comprehensive Neighborhood Rescue Plan. I can hardly wait to release it myself. It will be here soon!
24 Oct 2007 at 06:00 am | #
JFD, you made my day. I read your last post after waking up and I ROTFLMAO!! Urban Assault Vehicle from Stripes, BBWWAAAA!! Where is that ‘plan’ anyway??? Jeffre is a mockery of a sham of a debacle of a sham of a mockery of two debacles, isn’t he?
24 Oct 2007 at 01:29 pm | #
i get it clearly. you want to legislate things that you are not willing to do individually.
you were the one who brought up grease cars remember. if you are going to say you are “interested” in converting it i would think you had made it further than “gee i wish this thing was a greascar”
i am concerned for the environment actually. Think of my anonymous trolling as very similar to what the beacon does when you run out and accuse people of being hypocritical in their beliefs. You seem to enjoy shining the spotlights on others a lot more than you seem to enjoy having it on yourself.
I know you wont convert your own car because you are typical liberal. You would much rather pass a law that puts the burden of environmental protection on someone else than yourself. I am much more impressed with a candidate that has lives a lifestyle like they claim to support then tries to pass laws to further the cause. You would rather live your life how you want and impose burdens on others. that is why you are a hypocrite on this issue as well.
here is a political hint- more people will take you seriously when you live the lifestyle you want to impose on others.
just where do you think the government gets money from? it is of course from citizens like me. so you want to take my money and pool it with everyone elses to pay for something that you aren’t willing to spend your own money on. That is a problem and why people dont take you seriously.
Even though i dont agree with any of your politics I could at least respect you if you had any personal dignity.
24 Oct 2007 at 01:29 pm | #
Question for the Jeffres-
Why do you also drive your pick-up to events AND drive that slug of a bus?
I thought you were environmentally responsible, and I can understand you wanting a mobile office, but then driving a pick-up too, is environmentally ridiculous.
No, wait, I CAN’T UNDERSTAND YOU WANTING A MOBILE OFFICE. The only buses I have seen on campaigns are Senatorial or Congressional Candidates buses- they need them, you don’t.
Just use a port-o-let for your office. It seems more apt. That way you can shit on your environmental principles while doing your “work”.
24 Oct 2007 at 01:31 pm | #
Forgot- I read Nick Lachey was there to “christen” the bus.
As a fellow believer in all things conspiracy oriented, I want proof.
Please post a picture of Nick Lachey christening the bus with a bottle of OTR ale, otherwise I won’t believe it, thus it never happened and you are making shit up, like usual.
24 Oct 2007 at 02:06 pm | #
Oh now, Jeffre, there’s no need to slobber all over yourself. No one’s excited about your so-called rescue plan. We are curious to see if something truly exists & whether or not it’s an edited regurgitation of something that’s already been tried & fell flat on its azz.
BTW, what exactly is your definition of “soon”? You’ve missed the largest percentage of absentee voters. As I said before, Jeffre, put it out there or shut up & find another job where you can make millions.
JFD, Urban Assault Vehicle is the best! (Aaarrrmy training, sir!)
24 Oct 2007 at 08:14 pm | #
Are you serious? The thing was on Ch. 5 News all weekend!
24 Oct 2007 at 11:41 pm | #
To The Dean-
I am serious and I didn’t watch Channel 5 all weekend, I have better things to do. Thus, I did not see Nick Lachey and the fringemobile.
Now that you answered the easiest question for JJ2k, please answer the more difficult question:
Why does Justin also drive his pick-up to events AND drive that slug of a bus?
Dean & JJ2k- you guys are happy to criticize and grill everyone about everything, but once it turns on yourselves, your answers simply address the non-issue parts of questions.
If every person you interviewed did the same you guys would explode.
26 Oct 2007 at 08:11 am | #
Ask, and you shall receive:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/65091770@N00/1756802969/
26 Oct 2007 at 02:43 pm | #
anonymous, that’s not a difficult question, it’s just a stupid and irrelevant question. Our city is facing real problems and you little trolls are a part of it. Stop pushing jails! No means no!
27 Oct 2007 at 08:11 am | #
Two things
Don’t call people names.
Using Nick for publicity drains credibility from your campaign.
27 Oct 2007 at 04:09 pm | #
JJ2k-
How is my question irrelevant?
I simply asked “Why does Justin also drive his pick-up to events AND drive that slug of a bus?”
Given the fact that you are a supposed member of the Green Party and The Green Party is “committed to environmentalism” see (http://www.gp.org/about.shtml), the question is wholly relevant.
The first issue stated in their “about” page- is ENVIRONMENTALISM.
Driving that bus and a pick-up truck to the same place is not environmentally responsible. Nor is driving that bus.
You are a huge hypocrite.
Just answer the question.
And where is your plan? Neighborhood rescue? Sounds like a good name for a band.
27 Oct 2007 at 05:47 pm | #
Anonymous coward, your question is irrelevant because it has nothing to do with public policy or the direction of our city.
whatuptho, I don’t care what anonymous commenter’s have to say about credibility because they don’t have any in my opinion. Obviously Kevin Osbourne has a different opinion.
27 Oct 2007 at 06:44 pm | #
JJ #51 “Obviously Kevin Osbourne has a different opinion.”
Is this you turning up the heat on Kevin? Stop it already.
27 Oct 2007 at 06:54 pm | #
98ºboy™ cannot and will answer such questions, because he is a coward and a huge hypocrite and he knows it. He’s as much an environmentalist as Dick Cheney is.
How big is the engine on your aged RV 98ºboy™? Is it an 8, 10 or 12 cylinder? What is it’s gas mileage? Why do you drive two vehicles to events?
Oh, and before you dodge the question by throwing it back at me, my 6 cylinder 2005 Camry gets 28mpg on the highway and 23 in the city.
Now, “environmentalist” “green” candidate 98ºboy™, answer the question.
28 Oct 2007 at 04:52 am | #
BoybandJJ, YOU have nothing to do with public policy or the direction of our city. You are beyond irrelevant. Your candidacy is an amusing sideshow to 99% of the voters in Cincinnati.
BTW, what answer Capell’s question; what is the engine size & mileage of that 30 year old camper of yours? Also, show us your campaign finance report, if you even have one.
I demand an answer, or I’m going to turn up the heat on you.
Your deadline is 1pm tomorrow.
28 Oct 2007 at 08:48 pm | #
The only reason that this got any attention from the press was because Nick Lachey was there. Nick was always the star of the act, and is still a celebrity. Little Jeffre was a side man, and is no longer a celebrity in any sense of that word. He’s like one of those former childhood stars who are an occasional item of curiosity, like Garry Coleman, Todd Bridges or Dana Plato.
Well, the Former Celebrity certainly had himself a very lonely day on the campaign trail.
29 Oct 2007 at 03:00 pm | #
That picture is pretty funny.
I actually saw the JJ2k pick-up truck at the BP on Glenway. I got some gas and while inside asked the BP employee why the truck was there- if it was broken down, etc. The BP employee told me that the truck was not broken down there, that it was merely waiting there for hours. So long in fact the BP employee called his boss and asked him what to do.
I guess the BP boss felt sorry for him and said he could sit there at the corner of their property if he didn’t bother anyone.
That’s sad. It’s like having a panhandler in front of your building. You want to have them removed, but you feel sorry for them, so you don’t force the issue.
At least when Mitch Painter illegally tries to get attention on street corners, he has a few volunteers, signs, and bullhorns.
I also think it is hilarious that the photo shows Busken & McDonalds.
I wonder which one Michael Earl Patton was eating in?
The answer is both.
01 Nov 2007 at 12:54 pm | #
Oh. My. God.
Please stop. Please stop. Please Stop. Please stop.
Thank you.